• Welcome to RCTalk! 🚀

    Join the #1 RC community where hobbyists connect, share, and get expert advice on RC cars, trucks, boats, drones, and more!

    • Friendly & passionate RC enthusiasts
    • RC tips & troubleshooting
    • Buy, sell & trade RC gear
    • Share builds & upgrades

Side Mission: Replica Team Associated SC10 Mudflaps

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Spksh

Vintage
Supporter
Messages
691
Reaction score
2,146
Points
810
Location
Auckland, NZ
RC Driving Style
  1. Bashing
  2. Racing
I'm refurbishing (rehabilitating?) a couple of original Team Associated SC10s, and the original mudflaps are always beat to heck, if they're still attached at all.
IMG_3223.webp


And I'm not paying these kinds of prices:
ebay-sc10-mudflap-nope.webp


So, given modern desktop fabrication technology, what do we do? Well, first we whip up some vectors, and then we use a vinyl cutter to test fit with paper.
IMG_3224.webp


Then we grab some 1.5mm silicone sheet from AliExpress and do a few more passes with the blade at a very low pressure.
IMG_3198(1).webp


And let's throw some laser engraving in just for fun.
IMG_3220.webp

IMG_3225(1).webp


I don't love the look of rubber on rubber for the top "bracket". It's OK, but doesn't have a scale feel, you know? Having them as one piece of silicone is likely an artifact of reducing manufacturing costs, but it makes them tear easily too.
IMG_3226(1).webp


But I do like the look of 1mm 3d printed brackets, and they'll probably last a bit longer. I haven't finalized how I'll fix them together - maybe just silicone glue?
IMG_3227(1).webp


I'm loving the prototype, so I played with some other engraving patterns to see what worked.
Screenshot 2025-10-13 112207.webp


I don't love the border I left with the relief (skull and crossbones) because you need perfect alignment to make it look right, and relieving with the laser takes a lot longer and generates way more mess. So I think I'll stick with engraving, and I'm really liking the repeating pattern ones over the single logo design.
IMG_3256.webp


I've got some 1mm silicone sheet coming, and I'll try cutting the brackets out of that as a test too. The originals are about 3.25mm thick, and layering 3x 1.5mm feels too thick and heavy, and that may be why I'm liking the 3d printed versions more; they're closer to the originals in thickness.

This gives me confidence that I can replace the SC10 mudflaps with my own "aftermarket" creations without paying vintage prices.
 
Thank you! The problem now is that I just want to keep making mudflaps and not progress the real build 😅
Looks like theyre going for about $40 used on ebay 😏 you might be able to make a little cash off these
 
Still waiting for my 1mm silicone, but in the meantime lets try some adhesive.
IMG_3341.webp


Sticky.
IMG_3345(1).webp

IMG_3347(1).webp


And12 hours later, we can peel it all right off...
IMG_3349(1).webp


Silicone doesn't like to stick to anything, and I didn't key the surface at all. Plus, full cure time is 24 hours. So maybe I didn't set myself up for success here, but glue is always messy and having a more positive mechanical connection is probably the real answer.

The 3d printed brackets could snap together through the screw holes...
 
Still waiting for my 1mm silicone, but in the meantime lets try some adhesive.
View attachment 252421

Sticky.
View attachment 252422
View attachment 252423

And12 hours later, we can peel it all right off...
View attachment 252424

Silicone doesn't like to stick to anything, and I didn't key the surface at all. Plus, full cure time is 24 hours. So maybe I didn't set myself up for success here, but glue is always messy and having a more positive mechanical connection is probably the real answer.

The 3d printed brackets could snap together through the screw holes...
If RTV didn't work, they simply can't be bonded! 🤷‍♀️😉🤣
Maybe mechanical fasteners would be better. The flaps take some abuse. 👍
 
Two steps forward, three (?) steps back. First, let's print the brackets with integrated pegs.
IMG_3709(1).webp


And let's score at least one of the glue surfaces.
IMG_3715(1).webp

IMG_3716(1).webp


Where's Waldo (my mistakes)?
IMG_3717(1).webp


First, I didn't exclude the bracket cut-out from the glue scoring. You can see the nice diagonal lines through the gap. Second, my tolerances for the pegs was off, so I resorted to pliers, and well, you can see the result.

And third, most annoying, is that I haven't actually tried to screw these to the bumper before now. I'm a whole millimeter short. I'm very glad I have a (mostly) parametric model, but it does mean I have to reprint and re-cut everything.
 
A lot of work but they're gonna be killer when you finish. I think they look great as is. By being short do you mean the screw holes dont line up?

Thanks!

Yeah, the screw holes in the bumper are 30mm centers, and I worked off a flatbed scan of the kit rubber mudflap which has 29mm centers; possibly shrinkage after the molding process, possibly a design feature to hold them taut.
 
Redesigned the connector pin so it snaps together. The joining surfaces are like a third of a millimeter thick, so you only get one snap. Better make it count! The through-holes now line up with the bumper.

I printed this in grey ASA just to see if there would be any difference in snappiness. Also still using the 29mm hole spacing on the flaps I made earlier today, and hey look the rubber stretches.
IMG_3719(1).webp


1mm ASA is pretty bendy, and without glue there's a gap. Even when it's screwed in. Lever effect in action! Potentially this is not helped by stretching the rubber to match the 30mm hole spacing. We'll fix the spacing on the next revision of the flaps.
IMG_3720(1).webp

IMG_3721(1).webp


Let's try that RTV glue-up again, now that I've scored one side.
IMG_3722(1).webp
 
Back
Top