- Messages
- 6,166
- Reaction score
- 11,207
- Points
- 878
- Location
- Southern Maine
- RC Driving Style
- Bashing
- Racing
yes, but in real world verbiage, context, and intent and liability of use of those words is more than the simplified definition of the word.
this is asbestos which already has a bad rep that acts as a hot button, companies will try to minimize their involvement in using it as much as possible. you can tell by their verbiage in the safety recall pamphlet.
"was contaminated with" is a lot better look on them than "contains", any company would have used the former if they were able. the fact that the recall is only in EU, and not anywhere else also reinforces this, they are only going to go as far as the letter of the law forces them to and no further. if they were "covering their ass" as you say it would have been worldwide.
A volentary recall could imply guilt. I'll bet you a dollar their lawyers are better at this than both of us.
