Exactly...and, the same goes for any RC companies that were producing vehicles with appearances similar to a Jeep (without being licensed to do so). That is the correct, and legal, way to handle the situation. The way Traxxas had chosen to handle this is, in essence, the same way a certain ex-President* handles things...and, with the same "I'm too big for them to sue me" attitude. These companies know that they're "too small" to take up legal matters against Traxxas on their own...and, that is exactly why I suggested they band together, and file a Class-Action lawsuit against Traxxas (just don't file it in the state of Texas).I wonder if that is why FMS is no longer calling the Max Smasher the Max Smasher. On their site, it is listed as the Smasher now
Although only some of the affected companies are US-based, most of them so have offices in the US. The best...and smartest...thing they could do would be to file a Class-Action suit in the state for which the most offices of these companies is in. If the majority have offices in California, file the Class-Action suit in CA. If the majority have offices in New York, file the Class-Action suit in NY. Unfortunately, I don't think they will do this...in the end, they will just cower/cowtow to Traxxas' will, to which some could also end up going out of business. And, in the end, the true loss will be ours...the consumers.
This whole situation started because of 'names' being used...but, the truth is, because of how Traxxas decided to (illegally) deal with the matter, is no longer just about those few upgrade parts - is it's now about the entire aftermarket industry...what started as Traxxas rolling a 'pebble' down a snow-covered hill, is now becoming a snowball, and one that could drastically increase in size if it's not stopped. As much as I'd like for there to be a way for us, the end-users, to help, it's up to the affected companies to do what's needed.