If you look at any of the links to products in this thread - note the one end that goes into the transmission drive, the end with a ball and two pins sticking out.
True dogbones have one of those on BOTH ends of the driveshaft. The dogbones bounce around and if your suspension travel is set too long in the rear they can even fall out when a steep angle occurs on the A-arm.
As for the first link that olds posted - those are stock universals, like he said, something AE has added in recent years. Losi's always provided universals. The second is an MIP set, and the third, same thing, a stock but cupped version of a universal.
Which brings me to a very highly argued point: MIP CVD's are not true CVD's (constant velocity drives.) Any of you that have worked on a volkswagen, 4WD, or any other full-scale vehicle that employs CVD's will know the difference. A CVD is a massive ring with balls inside that slide along channels in the ring, and the axle floats in the center of this.
MIP CVD's are really universal drives that are pinned to the outer shaft instead of a reciprocating "U" in the other half of the shaft. Calling them CVD's is a good marketing strategy.
This doesn't make them inferior in any way. The idea is to reduce the drive train slop and provide a good constant drive to the rear wheels, which they do. The first hop-up you add to any older AE is to pull the dogbones and put MIP CVD's in. Like I said, with Losi's, it's "just more of the same" because they already have universals. I run MIP CVD's in all my electric and nitro AE trucks.
CVD's vs. universals? There are those that would argue this, but I won't, there really is no difference. The exception is axles with universals on both the outer end (wheel) and inner end (tranny) of the axle, with a slider shaft between. This, in theory, reduces all slop in the rear drive train, but the trade-off is that will only be as efficient as the sliding mechanism.