Join the #1 RC community where hobbyists connect, share, and get expert advice on RC cars, trucks, boats, drones, and more!
What I'm saying is, out of the two of us, I understand Boyle's Law and how it works in a hermetically sealed environment.
Oh we all know what your talking about. There's no need to add weights to anything but crawlers. And I've been in the hobby for 20+ yrs. Never once has adding water to tires come up. Not even in 1.1 scale crawler. Sorry I won't try it I like my tires/foams the way they are and to work properly. It doesn't make sense at all. The water doesn't have anywhere to go for conformity. To the obstacles..To each their own style. Guess you don't run much in cold weather or snow. Whatever floats you RC man......
Like I said your science means poop against actual proven tests
I guess In your 20 years you haven’t learned anything
Go back to school and learn basic science and scientific testing. The only testing youve done is anecdotal which means nothing. Do some actual scientific testing with actual measurable data on both methods and then come back and try to convince us. Until then Ill take scientific theory over anecdotal testing every day of the week.
Your an idiot. The testing I’ve done is called actual in the field running tests.
Ok...........if that's your crawler above? Then why does it look like you tires are solid. If you did have water and cut out your foam to add it. The tires would have a sag in them..from all the water and where did you plug them.. also you will never get 10hrs of run time on 2) 5200mah 2s lipos NEVER... also why in the two pics. The one it's upright. And looks like you have added weights behind back tiers. Then the one on its side. The weights aren't there.
I've learn not to listen to as*hats that don't know what the hell their talking about ..And I guess you don't know how to read since you've posted on threads from over 10 yrs ago.
Ok where's the testing results. Or let me guess there isn't any
Unless you have measurable data for both water filled tires and air filled tires then you're the idiot here. If youve done the actual scientific tests then post your data to prove it otherwise all you have is an opinion based on anecdotal evidence which is a fallacy. So go on, tell us how youve overcome the scientific laws of nature.
I don’t even know how to respond to your questions. I drilled my rims. Put the tires in a tub of water. Squeeze them till no bubbles then hot glue the hole. And yes I added rebar to the axles for unsprung weight if your science explains that to you
If your running air filled tires on a crawler your the idiot
says the guy trying to convince everyone hes overcome the basic laws of science
I run 2s parallel. 3 hours running and used 22% to g battery
Newb lol don’t read it then
Now it's at 3hrs. Keep your story straight man which one is It. good day man. Can't listen to this stupidity anymore
Not your opinion. Test runs. Do you not know how to test theories.. figure that out then come back. You should try it then reply
I’m not going on opinions. Not once did I say that. I’m going in actual facts.
You do realize that at 3 hours per 22% of 10,400mAh is 13.5 not 10 right? Apparently you dont know math as well as science
Again says the guy who doesn't know math or science.
