Riddle me this

[robmob]

194 is correct.

I'm a seed that's underground.
Many like to spread me around.
But my family it's said is quite insane.
And if you've a low I.Q you've this kind of brain.
Eat me raw and I'll make you sick.
Eat too much and your tongue will stick.


What am I?

 

[nitrogator]

it is a potatoe

 

[Rolex]

You're a peanut. You're family is nuts.

If you're looking to be technical, you're a legume.

 

[ohmygahitscoby]

You're a peanut.

EDIT: Aww man Rolex, you get to post before me. You suck. Haha.

 

[Rolex]

Suh-MOE-kin!!!

 

[ohmygahitscoby]

I bet you used Google to get the answers.

 

[Rolex]

Absolutely not. Other than the polar bear one, based on some lame poem, these are all just logic. I've always loved brain teasers. It keeps the gray matter in the pink.

 

[ohmygahitscoby]

Haha I know. I heard the peanut one at school.

 

[robmob]

Mr. Moody grumbles about bad time-keeping trains from morning till night!.

On one particular morning he was quite justified.

His train left on time for the one hour journey, to Clarksville, and it arrived 5 minutes late.

However, Mr. Moody 's watch showed it to be 3 minutes early, so he adjusted his watch by putting it forward 3 minutes.

His watch kept time during the day, and on the return journey in the evening the train started on time, according to his watch, and arrived on time, according to the station clock.

If the train traveled 25 percent faster on the return journey than it did on the morning journey, was the station clock fast or slow, and by how much?

 

[Rolex]

Station clock is 2 minutes slower than his watch.

EDIT....Error-error....


Station clock is 3 minutes fast.

 

[Candyman]

If I'm figuring right, the clock at the station is 6.25 minutes fast....

 

[Rolex]

I'm pretty sure that's wrong, since the trip was reduced to 45 minutes.

 

[itxploded]

he set his watch forward not back

 

[robmob]

The station clock is 3 minutes fast.

Rolex got it.

A man kills his wife. Many people watch him doing so.

Yet no one will ever be able to accuse him of murder. Why?

 

[neobart]

She was suffering from an incurable disease?

 

[robmob]

Doesn't explain how the husband doesn't get accused of murder.

 

[2000delux]

He turned off the life support?

 

[itxploded]

it was a mercy killing?
he told her something and she had a heeart attack?

 

[robmob]

No.

Try again.

No deception on the husbands part. He killed her and everyone knew it.

 

[2000delux]

Not a double jeopardy thing or something is it?