• Welcome to RCTalk! 🚀

    Join the #1 RC community where hobbyists connect, share, and get expert advice on RC cars, trucks, boats, drones, and more!

    • Friendly & passionate RC enthusiasts
    • RC tips & troubleshooting
    • Buy, sell & trade RC gear
    • Share builds & upgrades

Will too much nos, break the engine?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
sweetdiesel said:
Can you imagine the results using the proper virgin olive oil instead of canola? Mama mia!!!

I never tried that, but I imagine it works better in novarossi or other italian engines better.
 
Monkey Wrench said:
NOS is cool!:whistle:
I agree! All the REAL muscle cars use nawwzzz.. Why build a motor when ya can just buy a 200 shot of nawwz??? Nawwwzz is cool! I wish I had a nawzz hat
 
FALSE. You didn't read a single thing, did you? If you add more OXYGEN, you can now add proportionately more FUEL, producing more POWER. Does that sound like "leaner" to you?

The nitrous systems that i have seen for RC, this being about a year ago, only just did a direct injection of N2O into the engine. There was no more fuel being added, so yes, this did run leaner.

why are you trying to f&(*(* argue with me, i'm agreeing that Nitrous Oxide is not good for RC applications.
 
So, lets go...FLAME ON!
You started this.

The entire explanation, dear uninformed member, was for your benefit, to save you embarassment the next time you attempt to discuss NOS applications in radio controlled vehicles. As I pretty much figured, it fell on deaf ears, but one must try anyway.

There is no argument: you have lost all sense of reason.

So now your choices are to hold fast to your baseless convictions or re-read this thread looking for the positive input, either way it's up to you, I hold nothing personal here.

sweetdiesel said:
XRC did a test on the NX express system. It did produce considerable power gains but for only a second or two.

rocknbil said:
....and only recently has a device been build that actually works to some degree, and not enough to qualify the investment in money and weight.

Thank you for putting the name on it I couldn't remember. :D That is the new one from last year, correct? Big ol' honkin thing as I recall . . . but I still say the inability for most people to keep their RC's running with any consistency render it completely worthless.
 
Bill I love it when you post rhyme with reason:thankyou:
LOL I love you man!:)
 
I don't have a beer for ya buddy.But I do have this.


CROWN.webp


Drinks on me.
 
ZANDOR said:
I don't have a beer for ya buddy.But I do have this.

Goog, iss still cold, I thot the f&^&∈ ice woulda meleted by naw and it dind;t TANKS!

<slurp>
<slurp>
AHHHHHHHHhhhhhhh
<Belch>

OK now where TF was I . . .

THANKS!
:wasted:
 
rocknbil said:
Goog, iss still cold, I thot the f&^&&in; ice woulda meleted by naw and it dind;t TANKS!

<slurp>
<slurp>
AHHHHHHHHhhhhhhh
<Belch>

OK now where TF was I . . .

THANKS!
:wasted:



LOL waz howzzzz
 
ZANDOR said:
LOL waz howzzzz

Holy poop! A bottomless C.R on teh rox, therr it is agin!

<slurp>
<slurp>
AHHHHHHHHhhhhhhh
<BEEEEEEELCH>
:thankyou:

OK now where TF was I . . . f***in deja vu , , , oh yeah . . . .
 
dpk136 said:
Actually, the NOS adds quite a bit of HP to these. But, it will also add extra strain on the engine and you will have to rebuild much sooner.

NOS will also make it harder to drive. When the NOS kicks in you will get a big power boost that will make your wheels spin or worse, tear up your diffs.

I think it was the tone of this comment in an "I know better" way that set bill off..... and then you can't just admit the lack of knowledge in this statement, you defend the rest of it like it cancels this crap quoted above out....

If you read bills facts above, you would realize the sheer ignorance in your statements...
and trying to say that his "NO2" compound made ALL of his statements invalid because it's N2O (according to you) was truly nice....I bet you are never wrong and the sun rises and sets over you......


dpk136 said:
You add NOS, you get more O2 into the system, this in turn makes things faster. I don't really want to get into the physics of it. Ask any of the engineers.

wrong

dpk136 said:
Do i have concrete evidence...yes, it's the laws of physics.

Go back to school cause you missed the whole class on application of theory

dpk136 said:
So, lets go...FLAME ON!

I'm done flaming now......
 
i missed the drinks?? crap!! oh and screw some Nawws!! if you want real HP go buy some carbon fiber bits!!! OR get the STICKERS!!! all the hp of cf without the added weight!!

"flame on flamer!!"
 
Holy poop man, don't touch Zandor's Royal on page two, thiat poop does not mix well with Johnny Walker Black label. :wasted: Today I feel like my insides are dancing a jig . . . . oh well so much for my one-drunk-a-year . . . .

BUT I DIDN'T SMOKE so that's all good. :0
 
rocknbil said:
Holy poop man, don't touch Zandor's Royal on page two, thiat poop does not mix well with Johnny Walker Black label. :wasted: Today I feel like my insides are dancing a jig . . . . oh well so much for my one-drunk-a-year . . . .

BUT I DIDN'T SMOKE so that's all good. :0


Oh man! I can almost feel your pain here! Wow, you don't mess around, my friend!
 
dpk136 said:
The nitrous systems that i have seen for RC, this being about a year ago, only just did a direct injection of N2O into the engine. There was no more fuel being added, so yes, this did run leaner. . .

Whether this causes a lean or rich condtion I am not sure. But does anyone know what XRC did to overcome this in their test? Was the engine tuned to run properly, or was it somehow decided to run rich or lean to compensate for the addition of NOS?

sweetdiesel said:
. . . For drag racing it would be nice. For everything else, it would be a useless weight increasing item.

I think this is the case for real cars too.
 
you want my opinion? Anyone who calls N02 "Nos" is a stupid ricer and needs to go watch Fast and furious 1 more time. "Nos" is a name brand. Dudes talking about a NX no2 setup. Not "Nos".

anyway these threads are retarded. And you "Nos" ricer lovers are lucky I'm not a mod because Id lock these up before the 2nd post.
 
I used the phrase NOS because its easier to type than CH3NO2 or Nitrous Oxide. Just like you didn't bother to capitalize or use punctuation properly. Neither of us cared enough to be accurate.

Anyone else have an actual answer to my original question about re-tuning to accept the kit?
 
I'm not arguing about the NOS comment...but it is like using Kleenex, Q-Tip, or Coke. Most people don't really use Tissue or Cotton Swab. I don't think NOS has anything to do with Fast and Furious, it was big WAY before that.

Nitrous Oxide is N2O look at this it tells you a lot about NOS (as stated in the first paragraph) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrous_oxide

And if you don't trust that source go to here http://news.com.com/Study+Wikipedia+as+accurate+as+Britannica/2100-1038_3-5997332.html

I was never trying to overdo Bill, simply trying to correct that N2O does work. It is not a very good thing to spend your money on, but it does work. This thread started because he wanted to know if it was worth it....I just said that it does work, but don't waste your money. So, no one has pointed out exactly where i'm wrong in this statement. you say i don't have sources...You can go out and find all the same information and see that i'm right.
 
Back
Top