Greywolf74
I'M TO BLAME!
Lifetime Supporter!
Supporter
Excellence Award
Hospitality Award
Build Thread Contributor
RC Showcase: 8
I showed the nitro side some love by reposting an article I read about glow plugs so I figured Id do the same thing and show the Electric side some love this time 
One thing that I would like to add to this is that when they talk about electric motors that are higher RPM the article keeps saying that the tradeoff is shorter battery life. That may be true but the more important trade off that they don't even mention is that of torque. The higher RPM the motor is the less torque it will have. With that in mind Higher RPM doesn't always mean faster either. What I mean by that is this. Lats say you have a 3800kv motor and a 5400kv motor. The 5400kv motor is higher RPM so given that the gearing does not change then yes a 5400kv motor would be faster than a 3800kv motor. However, a 3800kv motor has more torque and because of that you can run a bigger pinion thereby turning that extra torque into speed and sometimes you will actually be better off by choosing this option over simply buying a motor with higher KV ratings (or lower Turn ratings).
Castle size comparison pic.
Going from left to right I believe these are:
2028 - 800kv - 1/5 Scale - 720L can size
1717 - 1650kv - 1/6 Scale - Can size on this motor is odd. Its somewhere between a 700 and a 720 if you're going by the dimensions of it.
1515 - 2200kv - 1/8 Scale - 670 can size
1512 - 1800kv - 1/8 Scale - 670 can size
1415 - 2400kv - 1/10 scale - Another oddball can size but the closest size is a 540XL
1406 - 7700kv - 1/10 scale - 540 can size
View attachment 126582
I've learned a lot since I originally posted this info. Back in 2017, when I posted this, I believed in the myth that lower kV meant higher torque. I think that myth stems from a misunderstanding of the fact that Kt (torque per ampere) is inversely proportional to Kv (rpm per volt). My current understanding is that the maximum torque a motor can output is dictated by the size of the rotor and the stator. So if you had a 1000kV motor and a 5000kV motor that have the same exact size rotor and stator both motors can generate the same amount of torque. The problem is as the kV goes up the amount of amperage required to generate that torque increases. As amp draws increase the more heat is generated which also means capacity is consumed at a greater rate which Bill's post is a perfect example of that. One way you can bring amp draw down while keeping RPM up is to increase voltage but higher kV motors have lower voltage tolerances because of RPM limits. A given motors RPM limit is dictated by its magnetic capacity. The magnetic capacity of the motor's magnetic (iron) circuit is designed to the relationship: voltage/frequency (V/f). If the frequency drops the V/Hz goes up. This means that the motor needs a larger magnetic circuit. Without it, the magnetic circuit can be overloaded. This is called saturation and it leads to a rapid increase in current draw and a corresponding large increase in temperature, a motor's chief enemy.
That is my current understanding anyway and I always welcome civil discourse as that is one of the best ways to learn
One thing that I would like to add to this is that when they talk about electric motors that are higher RPM the article keeps saying that the tradeoff is shorter battery life. That may be true but the more important trade off that they don't even mention is that of torque. The higher RPM the motor is the less torque it will have. With that in mind Higher RPM doesn't always mean faster either. What I mean by that is this. Lats say you have a 3800kv motor and a 5400kv motor. The 5400kv motor is higher RPM so given that the gearing does not change then yes a 5400kv motor would be faster than a 3800kv motor. However, a 3800kv motor has more torque and because of that you can run a bigger pinion thereby turning that extra torque into speed and sometimes you will actually be better off by choosing this option over simply buying a motor with higher KV ratings (or lower Turn ratings).
Castle size comparison pic.
Going from left to right I believe these are:
2028 - 800kv - 1/5 Scale - 720L can size
1717 - 1650kv - 1/6 Scale - Can size on this motor is odd. Its somewhere between a 700 and a 720 if you're going by the dimensions of it.
1515 - 2200kv - 1/8 Scale - 670 can size
1512 - 1800kv - 1/8 Scale - 670 can size
1415 - 2400kv - 1/10 scale - Another oddball can size but the closest size is a 540XL
1406 - 7700kv - 1/10 scale - 540 can size
View attachment 126582
I've learned a lot since I originally posted this info. Back in 2017, when I posted this, I believed in the myth that lower kV meant higher torque. I think that myth stems from a misunderstanding of the fact that Kt (torque per ampere) is inversely proportional to Kv (rpm per volt). My current understanding is that the maximum torque a motor can output is dictated by the size of the rotor and the stator. So if you had a 1000kV motor and a 5000kV motor that have the same exact size rotor and stator both motors can generate the same amount of torque. The problem is as the kV goes up the amount of amperage required to generate that torque increases. As amp draws increase the more heat is generated which also means capacity is consumed at a greater rate which Bill's post is a perfect example of that. One way you can bring amp draw down while keeping RPM up is to increase voltage but higher kV motors have lower voltage tolerances because of RPM limits. A given motors RPM limit is dictated by its magnetic capacity. The magnetic capacity of the motor's magnetic (iron) circuit is designed to the relationship: voltage/frequency (V/f). If the frequency drops the V/Hz goes up. This means that the motor needs a larger magnetic circuit. Without it, the magnetic circuit can be overloaded. This is called saturation and it leads to a rapid increase in current draw and a corresponding large increase in temperature, a motor's chief enemy.
That is my current understanding anyway and I always welcome civil discourse as that is one of the best ways to learn
Last edited by a moderator: