• Join the BEST RC Forum!

    Looking to connect with fellow RC enthusiasts? Whether you're just getting started or a seasoned pro, RC Talk is the perfect RC forum place to explore, learn, and share everything about RC cars, trucks, drones, and more!

    • A friendly community who share your passion for RC vehicles.
    • Get expert tips from experienced RC hobbyists.
    • Buy, sell, & trade RC cars and parts with other trusted members.
    • Share your RC builds, and upgrades in the RC Showcase.

A backslash... (mid motor rendition)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

kawood100

RCTalk Member
Messages
37
Reaction score
141
Points
110
Location
Salt Lake City Utah
RC Driving Style
  1. Racing
Backslash... ( I saw someone call them that somewhere )

Long ago (30 years back) I built an RC10 Mid. (WAY before all these modern mid-2wd buggies which seem to be all the rage on track ) She had that feared stealth trans, some reedy motor, long throw shocks up front.... it was painted simple gray. It was not a flashy car... just gray, a black wing & white wheels.. ribbed up front, fuzzies on the rear.

... But nobody beat it. It outhandled everyone.

In the RC10, you could just spin the transmission around and dump it between the existing arm blocks, spin the arms backwards with the motor plate on the other side. Thus, it did work. The Arms were Zero Degrees and Toe was controlled by the mounts. Those never moved because they were separate. This is why it worked. (some here figured that out too)


With the Slash, you cannot just spin the whole stock transmission around because the forward "lean" angles for the mounts of the lower arms will be wrong and, facing the wrong way. The hit of forward momentum on the truck won't act right and the rear will be "stiff" no matter what you do to it. Secondly, the Arms on the slash determine toe... when you spin them around, you're toed out. This causes the rear end to become geometrically unsound and unpredictable. (e.g. squirly, stiff feeling, won't hook up, spins out no matter what you do... etc.)

"One" way to make a mid from a slash is using the RPM gearcase, and reverse the polarity on the modern engine. RPM 0 Deg arm mounts/blocks facing the normal way. This gives you the right front momentum angles. Then, use the stock rear arms FACING FORWARD (as the toe is determined by them) drill the shock mount hole in the back of it right where the stock one should be on the other side. This puts it all in proper configuration. The RPM arms don't work for it because there isn't really enough material to use as a mount on the non-shock side. IF Rpm or anyone made a 6 Deg arm mount, you could run the arms backwards and pull it off... but they don't and the stock gearcase was designed to work one way.

Side note: You could, use RPM 3Deg mounts, with the arms backwards on a road car, that'd give a Zero Toe and could work. (e.g... Arm mounts at 3 deg, arms backwards would be -3 Deg = 0.)

Then, to make it handle right... I've put the battery across the frame, not along it like I did long ago. The Slash loves weight in the back to handle. Slip the battery back close to the motor, then you've got a huge area to place things nice & low. Bonus here: You can move the battery holes forward or back to adjust where that happy place is for you, mounting your other bits as needed.

The last part to making it handle & such... drop that back end low. Like, sitting 1/2 inch off the ground at rest... and run the front a smidge high (red springs all around)... set that slipper just right... and she'll handle after that. (watch the rotation though while airborn... behavior still leans in the 4wd realm, so one might adjust their driving style. Get used to that, and it might surprise ya.

Seen here, my goofing off. Aarma wheeels, ST-RC 14MM adapters, Wiped out a slash stock chassis for the battery box (so you can slip in them larger ones), one piece of G10 fiberglass use somee 30 yrs back in a street car build... the remnants of an HPI Jumpshot flux frame cut just so, and an LCG front end all hacked up. (and other misc things spun around, upside down, hacked, drilled, etc.)

It's a Mutt!

And you get this. An LCG Mid. It's built to be flexible in areas allowing it to "probably"... rule the track again. We'll test it soon after I make a few things for it. It's all just misc crap for now. I'm not done yet making it tall purdy.

Oh yes, body mounts in the rear are 1/2" behind normal here. Front is the same.

Yep.

001.webp


002.webp


004.webp


005.webp


006.webp


007.webp


008.webp


010.webp
 
Hey @luke66 I found what I was looking for! A chassis that I could use to keep using full size stick packs instead of shorties!

Great build @kawood100

Is this a custom chassis or was this from Chuckworks rc? I think it looks like one of his chassis
 
Yay rear bumper too!
On @luke66 's builds where he used the NITRO rustler/slash chassis to flip the whole transmission around, you can't use the rear bumper. But I think he was slowly working on a 3D printed mount for one, or a wheelie bar as well.

Does this do great on the track and for racing?
 
Hey @luke66 I found what I was looking for! A chassis that I could use to keep using full size stick packs instead of shorties!

Great build @kawood100

Is this a custom chassis or was this from Chuckworks rc? I think it looks like one of his chassis
Totally custom. I made it up with what I had on hand. But, the point being... you can't spin that stock tranny around... no matter what frame it's on. It won't act right.
 
Yay rear bumper too!
On @luke66 's builds where he used the NITRO rustler/slash chassis to flip the whole transmission around, you can't use the rear bumper. But I think he was slowly working on a 3D printed mount for one, or a wheelie bar as well.

Does this do great on the track and for racing?
I'll let you know on that. I just made it from scraps. It worked 30 years back, I see no reason it won't work.
 
Just analyzing the pics a bit more. And I have 1 suggestion, the 2 screws in the rear (I guess holding in the transmission?) Me personally I would counter sunk them and use flat head screws instead of the caps so the heads don't get scrapped on or rounded when running.
 
I'll let you know on that. I just made it from scraps. It worked 30 years back, I see no reason it won't work.
Nice. Yeah my slash is still rear motor. I mostly race on indoor high grip carpet and sealed dirt. Its a handful on the track. Can't go fast into turns or go fast in sweepers as it will just wipe out. Could also be that I am running a powerful 3660 4k-kv motor. That's a handful on the track too but perfect for bashing.
 
Just analyzing the pics a bit more. And I have 1 suggestion, the 2 screws in the rear (I guess holding in the transmission?) Me personally I would counter sunk them and use flat head screws instead of the caps so the heads don't get scrapped on or rounded when running.
Good observation. This is a mock up for now, all will be countersunk when done of course. Just sharing a project for all to look at. :)
 
Totally custom. I made it up with what I had on hand. But, the point being... you can't spin that stock tranny around... no matter what frame it's on. It won't act right.
Yeah, I’m using the stock trans for now until I can put in a RPM or other tranny case.


Super rad build man! This is in a whole different league. Have you considered Carbon Fiber chassis? Sheets of CF can be really cheap on Aliexpress. I’m planning on trying it with a mid-motored Bandit.
 
Yeah, I’m using the stock trans for now until I can put in a RPM or other tranny case.


Super rad build man! This is in a whole different league. Have you considered Carbon Fiber chassis? Sheets of CF can be really cheap on Aliexpress. I’m planning on trying it with a mid-motored Bandit.
I may go CF when I'm done but the 2nd mock up will be a G10 frame. I don't want to go too light or rigid as rigid tends to stress other areas. A certain flexibility is your friend. Too light, gives an unpredictable feeling and I'm going for a simple setup that allows for stock things to work from the get-go. As it is, the front section is more rigid as I did it, while the back end can flex around a bit.

I'll post dimensions & exactly what I did when done if anyone wants to play around with it. For instance: The bumper on the back, is just a modified stock bumper... and the mount from Trans to frame was also part of the rear bumper spun around with holes in it. The only 2 custom pieces here are the frame rails and one mount (from the HPI truck... not actually needed but look neato!) and the lower G10 frame.
 
so this is actually a very good setup ... if you didn't know most the custom works oval sprint and latemodel cars are setup this way .... to be able to flip the trans to either be mid or rear motor ... they also have an option to lower the cg by using a " laydown" trans and it's all based off the stealth transmission design ... the diffs are all ae design for the b6 series .... so on a cw car you can have mid or rear and high or low cg type
 
so this is actually a very good setup ... if you didn't know most the custom works oval sprint and latemodel cars are setup this way .... to be able to flip the trans to either be mid or rear motor ... they also have an option to lower the cg by using a " laydown" trans and it's all based off the stealth transmission design ... the diffs are all ae design for the b6 series .... so on a cw car you can have mid or rear and high or low cg type
Thanks! I didn't know that.
 
Thanks! I didn't know that.
the real challenge comes into trying to understand when and why you use each configuration or setup ... isally a rear motor will handle better on etreamly loose tracks ... a mid works better on med/higher bite tracks ... whereas low setup works better in wider turns( more push due to weight less transfer ) whereas higher has more weight transfer which equals sharper turning ( less push)
 
the real challenge comes into trying to understand when and why you use each configuration or setup ... isally a rear motor will handle better on etreamly loose tracks ... a mid works better on med/higher bite tracks ... whereas low setup works better in wider turns( more push due to weight less transfer ) whereas higher has more weight transfer which equals sharper turning ( less push)
yessir. You know it. Having done it for some 40 years here... (although this is just messing around) there is a point to it. Share it, play.. and drive (and roast everyone on my track when I over-watered it and bite is at maximum. ;) )

449823802_2514508562090589_2243187632814681075_n.webp
 
yessir. You know it. Having done it for some 40 years here... (although this is just messing around) there is a point to it. Share it, play.. and drive (and roast everyone on my track when I over-watered it and bite is at maximum. ;) )

View attachment 208858
that's an awesome looking track ... although I'd have to say my wife would be a little upset I used the entire backyard for toy cars hahahahahahaha
 
that's an awesome looking track ... although I'd have to say my wife would be a little upset I used the entire backyard for toy cars hahahahahahaha
Thanks! Well ya know... Kids grown... and a back yard that nothing happens in. It's just how it goes! (ton's of work to make that by hand too.. but worth it)

464735014_2621656738042437_1615395348747824067_n.webp
 
Back
Top