centerline (vertical) servo only amounts to more uncontrollable rotational mass in the air, the laydown= sure fire flattened out launching.. and mid-air travel, most cars can be set-up for handling any ground, but in-air stability is pretty key, just look at any car with verticaly mounted gear..
in air travel is a simplified version of what happens on-the-ground.....
if the car has a more overall vertical setting of its internals it will tend to have more uncontrollable suspension roll, more problems controlling rotational inertia thru air and on the ground,
a lower flatter , more horizontaly distributed mass = overall stability and handling will benefit ... simple logic pushed to ,, applied logic....
I don't know about you, but when I can just change an arm on a horizontally mounted servo and adjust the ackerman,, I'll take that vs' broken arms from 30 ' jumps and cartwheels...
or mute all that,, if you look at the way the overall vehicle is set-up, does the vertical or laydown servo equal out the weight of the car,, in this case the horiz servo does. just look at it..
Aluminum servo mounts would be trick.
whatever I guess, I'm just a paint guy.
-Will-
www.WilzWerx.com
Originally posted by Race Director
disagree.
Raising servo enables positioning as much weight to the centreline of the car as possible, this enables sharper handling, and as most of the weight of a servo is in the bottom of the casing, C.G. is raised to a negligible degree, but roll moments are reduced.
Positioning of the servo like this enables parallel servo arm/steering arm, so left/right steering is even (whereas at the moment I am finding 20% difference).
The other thing is, not all servos are the same size so won't fit the current moulding!
Front servo plate post would benefit from being metal too (too much movement at the moment)
I want to see this car as good as it gets, to get there it's got to be a dream to maintain.
Oh, what's the best plug for the stock motor? (I put in a cold plug this afternoon and it went great, 16% nitro - 200°F)