• Welcome to RCTalk! 🚀

    Join the #1 RC community where hobbyists connect, share, and get expert advice on RC cars, trucks, boats, drones, and more!

    • Friendly & passionate RC enthusiasts
    • RC tips & troubleshooting
    • Buy, sell & trade RC gear
    • Share builds & upgrades

Final Proof for what I call BS - top speed

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Nitronewbie, what I was trying to get at was that torque is NOT the only determining factor in how fast something will accelerate and when it comes down to it the RPM and Horsepower ( think of it as the ability to maintain torque) of the engine along with the gears are what determines acceleration.

A lot of the Honda's and Acura's with 170hp and only 120lb/ft of torque versus other cars with largers motors that have 170hp and 170lb/ft torque yet still go the same speed and accelerate similarly. Because the Honda/Acura motor revs so high, the gears can be used to compensate for the lack of torque the motor makes so the car can perform much better. THAT is what I was trying to get at. In essence torque is not as relevant when there are many other variables.

Both engine torque and power is measured at the engine flywheel. The power is proportional to the torque times the engine speed. If an engine has 200 Nm at 4000 RPM, it has 114 HP at the same engine speed. One european HP equals 736 Watts, as opposed to the american HP, which is 746 Watts.

(formula: 736*HP=Nm*2*PI*RPM/60)

The gearbox has the ability to amplify torque. Most engines are too weak to get a car going with a 1:1 ratio. Because of this, most cars have more than 10:1 reduction through the gearbox and differential in the first gear. This amplifies the torque at the wheels to more than ten times the torque at the flywheel. In the top gear the ratio is typically 3:1.

Power, on the other hand, is unchanged on either side of the transmission, at least if you ignore the mechanical loss, which might be about 10 percent.

Power is the amount of energy the engine can produce every second. This energy is used to increase or maintain the kinetic energy of the car. The higher the power, the more acceleration you get.

Power can also be expressed as force times speed. If the car goes faster, the force (and acceleration) is reduced, even though the power is unchanged. If there is more power available in another gear, the car will accelerate better if you change to that gear. Always.

Since the torque curves on modern cars are very flat, the power curves usually rise all the way to the maximum allowed engine speed. To obtain the best possible acceleration, you should not change gears before right at the rev limiter.

Within one specific gear, the best acceleration will take place at the point of maximum torque. Still, it would be even more effective to use a lower gear, since the torque at the wheels is greater than in the current gear.

If you take air drag into consideration, the maximum acceleration will of course occur slightly before you reach maximum torque, since drag increases with speed.

The conclusion is that the torque is important, but it is just as important at what engine speed the torque is produced. 200 Nm at 5000 RPM is twice as useful as 200 Nm at 2500 RPM. The reason for this is that a twice as low gear can be used, and this doubles the torque at the wheels.

The power takes engine speed into consideration, and says a lot more. The power at the wheels is the same, no matter what gear you are using.


As for the bicycle crank, I belive you are forgetting that you are not simply standing on the crank but also using your muscles to push it down creating more force than simply your weight at the end of the crank.
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by solo racer
A lot of the Honda's and Acura's with 170hp and only 120lb/ft of torque versus other cars with largers motors that have 170hp and 170lb/ft torque yet still go the same speed and accelerate similarly.

As for the bicycle crank, I belive you are forgetting that you are not simply standing on the crank but also using your muscles to push it down creating more force than simply your weight at the end of the crank.

afor comment 1. if an engine producing 170/170 with the same gears, weight, ect was dyno'd against the exact same parameters using 170/120, the first vehicle would accelerate quicker. agreed, u can manipulate acceleration with gearing. that is true. however, if we used this variable for example: a 1996 ford mustang 4.6L v8 stock puts out 240SHP, and 221lb/ft. a honda S2000 engine stock puts out approx the same amount of hp, and about 130lb/ft of torque. if you were to input the mustang engine into the same formula as the s2000 engine, the ford engine would beat the honda engine in acceleration by approx 85%. or almost double. This scenerio is taking into account equal variables, such as weight, gearing, ect.

as for the bicycle comment, no matter how hard u push on the pedal, u will never exceed your own weight in torque. the only way this would be different, would be with a 2nd variable of two seperate factors. u installed a leverage point in which u could use your upper body to push against the force, which a bicycle doesn't have, or were seated, in which the force coming down would be significantly less. This scientific fact can be proved by standing on a scale. stand on a scale. now place both hands on top of your head. no matter how hard u press on your head, the scale will not move, as it is impossible to adjust the specific gravity (ie weight by density) without an altering third force.

point being: acceleration is increased with torque, to adjust it with gearing, is essentially increasing the torque of that engine at a specific powerband, ie - lengthening or shortening the lever, or crank. it is impossible to increase HP and acceleration, without increasing torque. HP is derived from a formula, it has no bearing on the actual mechanics of an engine.

one addition - as i did not finish reading ur post, before i replied. torque is used most efficiently at a lower RPM than a higher RPM. u have it backwards
 
I agree with the scale comment but I don't know how you ride a bike, but when I want to get the most acceleration I use the handle bars to hold me down as I push, thus creating more force than just my body weight.
 
holding the handlebars, the normal way would not create downforce. For a force to act against an object, it must be moving the opposite way. when u hold the handlebars, the only way u could increase pressure on the pedal would be to hold the handlebars, palms up. using the normal riding style of palms down, would allow only the thumb to aid in the increased pressure, of which the effect would be nil. The only time this would not apply, would be in the case of a racer, who clips his shoes to the pedals, thus allowing him to use force on the upstroke as well, then, on the upstroke, his hands would be in the right position to aid in an increase of torque, however even then, the only addition this would create, would be the amount of weight the arm muscles would provide, which also would be a small amount. i would highly doubt that the average person could create more than 20-30 lbs of torque with his hands in the position one is in whill riding a bicycle.
 
Originally posted by Çh®i§tiªñ
Well if my penis was bigger then your penis.... IF !

statements like that are why fasteddy, and woodie are playing tag with ur wife, lol J/K
 
re:Traxxas 4 tec

That has to be that 2.5 on it, right? Yeah, some guy brought that out where we run. Just broken in. He was running quick. I was thinking under 55mph. He got me on a couple of runs, but I adjusted and we were neck to neck.

My buddy has a radar gun, but when it came time to taping the readout wasn't working right. That's why the readouts on our vids looked weird or wasn't working.
 
Posted by Nitronewbie
ok - first max - i was not refering to the tmaxx, i was reverring only to the 4tec, this was related to the radar tests of touring cars. second - the reason ur tmax does wheelies at will is to to the tremendous grip those tires provide - lower that maxx down, and put some radials on it, and it would stop doing wheelies.

I know your not referring to the Maxx, I was. The comparrison I was makeing was that to other .15 engines not vehicles. What I am saying is that I haven't seen too many .15ci engines make a maxx wheelie or roll over, not saying that there isn't any out there. The point is, you described the 2.5 performance in opposite of what I know first hand, the 2.5 IS a high tourqe engine no matter what you bolt it up to. Second,if you are saying that the only way to produce more TQ on a bike, is to weigh more, that would only be true on a unicycle. Why? Because on a pedal bike you can create more down force by utilizing the handlebars as a lever. Oh yeah one more thing, Ford has never made a 4.6 engine with 240 hp and 215TQ Also a 4.6 has never made more Hp than TQ. The 96 4.6 has 215 HP And 280 TQ. Just adding that incase you were just being hypothetic and I misunderstood. I really enjoy these technical discussions:thumbsup:
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by M@xximillion
Second,if you are saying that the only way to produce more TQ on a bike, is to weigh more, that would only be true on a unicycle. Why? Because on a pedal bike you can create more down force by utilizing the handlebars as a lever.


i believe i already covered this comment, which was made by solo. the only force acting upon the handle bars would be your thumb. please refer to my post a view posts up, directly before christians comment.

as for the mustang engine - i am not that familiar with ford engines, i just knew it was around there somewhere. and u are correct it is 215/280 for the 4.6L. i was just trying to think of a low hp V8 that i could compare to the honda engine.
 
Originally posted by Nitroaddict
holding the handlebars, the normal way would not create downforce. For a force to act against an object, it must be moving the opposite way. when u hold the handlebars, the only way u could increase pressure on the pedal would be to hold the handlebars, palms up. using the normal riding style of palms down, would allow only the thumb to aid in the increased pressure, of which the effect would be nil.

If this is the what you are justifing you statement with You are further off than I thought. I am not flaming you by any means, but you are still not correct, you do not need to change you hand position to create downforce dude. Anyone here, do this, go outside and get on your bicycle and goto the bottom of the biggest hill you can find. Fist try to pedal up sitting down. Then, pedal up standing up. Next pedal standing up and as you are on your down stroke pull on the handlebars. let us know which trip was easiest. Basicly it's just like rowing a boat. Now with that said I will not comment on this topic anymore, I will ask that atleast someone do my little experiment and comment, as I cannot construe an easier way to explain this. One added note, if holding the bars palms up created more downforce, then all handlebars would be shaped like a Y.
 
think about it max - if ur hands and weight are pressing 'down' on the handle bars, then essentially u are lifting 'up' with ur body. this would create less pressure, and less torque. The way you increase yur power is to 'pull' 'up' on the handlebars, and that is done only with your fingers/thumb. yes, u are correct in stating that the handlebars help with the downforce, but by such a minimal amount, it is inconsiquiential. The best way to test this, is to do something similar to what u suggested. only use a stationary bike, as to not take balance into effect. ride the bike without hands, and with hands, accelerating on a difficuly setting both times. u will see that the chronometer on the bike will increase by 1 or 2 MPH, and that is it. which as i said before is not worthy of factoring in the equation. to drastically increase torque, u would have to hold ur hands, palms up, on the handlebars, once u have tried this method, u will see the speed increase 6-7mph, which is 300% greater than the previous increase
 
I know, I said I wouldn't reply, but I have to admit, I can't seem to let this one go.

think about it max - if ur hands and weight are pressing 'down' on the handle bars,

Maybe you press down for some reason, but when I accelerate on a pedal bike, I pull with my hands and push with my legs. Think of it like that, it is very simple, your just over engineering a simple motion.
NOw maybe on a mountain bike the physics change slightly due to position, but I gaurentee if you climb a hill with any bike you end up standing and pulling to create more torque. You hand position won't change either. And I will smoke any 300 pound anyone on acceleration on any bicycle. It has absolutly nothing at all to do with the weight of the rider unless your talking "muscular bigger" then your correct.
 
two things max - and then we will stop, lol.

1. when using ur hands - yes it helps - however, u are pulling, therefore u are only using your fingers, as if u were to pull on a door handle, you wouldnt have as much leverage as if u were to push on it.

2. regarding my comment about the 300 lbs. it was made strictly for the purpose of measuring torque via an equation, and had nothing to do with actually riding a bike. i agree, any of us would most likely beat someone who was 300lbs overweight,
 
Back
Top