- Thread starter
- #41
HIPS arrived. Let's try using it as the support interface layer with defaults and see what happens.
At 0.08mm layer height, there's lots of nozzle dragging. Supports came away pretty easily, but the HIPS is embedded in chunks.
Did some Google spelunking, and I saw a few suggestions that <0.2mm layer height, you're going to always get this chunking. Tried 0.2mm layers and it was way cleaner. Still a few embeds, and supports were slightly harder to detach, but I'm pretty happy with the surface quality for not having to babysit the print.
Comparison with the pre-printed and painters taped supports. Where the pre-printed supports aligned perfectly, the surface finish is way better.
I'll do some more experiments (and actually calibrate the HIPS filament) and see if we can improve the results. I want to get back down closer to the 0.06mm layer height, so I get less stair-stepping on the angles.
Interestingly, the 0.2mm layer height (bottom) print has a different sheen to the other two. More glossy.
At 0.08mm layer height, there's lots of nozzle dragging. Supports came away pretty easily, but the HIPS is embedded in chunks.
Did some Google spelunking, and I saw a few suggestions that <0.2mm layer height, you're going to always get this chunking. Tried 0.2mm layers and it was way cleaner. Still a few embeds, and supports were slightly harder to detach, but I'm pretty happy with the surface quality for not having to babysit the print.
Comparison with the pre-printed and painters taped supports. Where the pre-printed supports aligned perfectly, the surface finish is way better.
I'll do some more experiments (and actually calibrate the HIPS filament) and see if we can improve the results. I want to get back down closer to the 0.06mm layer height, so I get less stair-stepping on the angles.
Interestingly, the 0.2mm layer height (bottom) print has a different sheen to the other two. More glossy.