• Welcome to RCTalk! 🚀

    Join the #1 RC community where hobbyists connect, share, and get expert advice on RC cars, trucks, boats, drones, and more!

    • Friendly & passionate RC enthusiasts
    • RC tips & troubleshooting
    • Buy, sell & trade RC gear
    • Share builds & upgrades

Black SVT Mustang

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

BlueRidge1

RCTalk Qualifier
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
Points
0
RC Driving Style
I guess I've been in a cave the last few years (kids will do that to ya), but I heard the other day that newer Mustang SVT's put out 390 HP. So I have had my radar tuned for one the last few weeks. Well, I saw one of these black beauties last Friday and all I can say is SWEET. Anybody here have one? I used to own a Mustang 5.0 back in my crazier years. That was only 225HP, and it still zipped along nicely. 390HP seems really over the top - I like it. :dance:
 
Why would you want a junkstang. Go with the new GTO or the new Dodge SSRT truck.
 
The 390hp is underrated btw.... dynos have shown that a stock stang put out up to 425hp.. since its supercharged it reacts very nicely to breathing mods like exhaust, heads, throttle bodies, intakes and so on and so forth. Or just change the pully and bam, 50 more horses.

500hp is easily attainable with the Cobra.

Thomas

Oh and btw... you can never have enough horsepower! :nuke:
 
I hate mustangs but those bicthes ROLL! Supercharged = fiddlesticking throttle response. That much HP with no spool time yes dear god yes!
 
Originally posted by Waste Land
I hate mustangs but those bicthes ROLL! Supercharged = fiddlesticking throttle response. That much HP with no spool time yes dear god yes!

Calm down WL, you sound like you're about to have an orgasm!
 
Originally posted by Diver6127


Calm down WL, you sound like you're about to have an orgasm!
LOL, I just might have, is that why my pants feal all gooey? Dude super charged cars rule about having just crazy accel because of the belt drive system, just damn exciting. Turbo cars have more of the force but they take time to spool up and just dump power all at once. FI just damn rules.
 
Originally posted by gutterboy
Why would you want a junkstang. Go with the new GTO or the new Dodge SSRT truck.
If I could turn back the hands of time I never would have sold my 68 GTO, screw the new ones!
 
Originally posted by El Pirata
If I could turn back the hands of time I never would have sold my 68 GTO, screw the new ones!

EL P I think I have a little more respect for you now. LOL Naw my dream car is a 65 GTO. Damn 389 with tri power. That is what real muscle cars are made of.
 
s/c 5.4

Carefull with the smaller pulleys. The s/c 5.4 won't handle much more hp with out the bottom end being beefed.
 
Originally posted by newnitrofan


EL P I think I have a little more respect for you now. LOL Naw my dream car is a 65 GTO. Damn 389 with tri power. That is what real muscle cars are made of.


The 67 Goat is my favorite. I "kinda" like the new GTO that is out now, but the hood is too plain for me. Performance from the LS1 is on par with GTO standards and the true duals sound nice but HOLDEN has had probs in Australia with the Monaro. I wonder if the bugs have been worked out since they started to import it in from Down under for this new GTO.I'm not gonna call it a GOAT yet. Still has to prove itself. Bob Lutz, head of the pontiac division, has his hands full with this project. I say give it to Jon Moss and let him do his magic, just like when he brought back the Impalla SS for the 94-96 run and 99-2000 run of the Tahoe Limited. Both of which is in our family garage.

At the moment, we have a 1972 LeMans sitting under the blanket. It used to be mine till I had an accident with it, Dad took it back after then and had everything straightened out and the body was torn down to bare metal and repainted. The engine (350ci)was just rebuilt and bored .30 over and only had 400 approx miles on it till I had the accident. Too much power for an inexperienced driver. Also had a 70 Torino GT with a the 302 HO ramair after that accident. It was a basket case but I took care of the body work and had it repainted 3 weeks after I got it as well as having a shiftkit put in it. Engine was strong but had to get rid of it after a year since I didn't have the garage space or funds to really tear it down and overhaul it the way it should've been done. I was only 20 and still in college aka, I was strapped for cash.

Nothing beats the days of old. Cars were solid, didn't care about anything but going straight fast. Turns were only dealt with when buying gas or pulling into the driveway.
 
Diver..

Sounds like you are a 350 man. Any opinion on how much one would have to spend to get 400 solid HP out of the LS1? Reason I ask is because the LS1 1998 TA/Camaros can be had in the 8-10K $$ range, and I've heard nothing but positive reviews on the LS1.

gutterboy...

Good question. I left the Mustang after the glory 5.0 days. Mustang fans will never forget 94 - more weight and less HP! Bad combo. Anyway, looks like they are back w/ a vengeance. How the HP pendulum swings.
 
now mustangs are nutthin compared to McLaren F1's but they cost a whole lot more than stangs hell the corvette is a good machine and that dodge srt truck has the viper engine on it so it may just scream down the road
 
Originally posted by HumboldtBlazer
2003 Saleen S7 427 V8 550HP 1/4 mile 11.36 secs speed for 1/4 mile 127

Saleens rule

Thats dumb. That much money that much power that big of an engine.......Here is a FWD Civic....NA....No Turbo.....No Nitrous All motor running 10.9s Quarter Linky link
 
Well I can show you an 88 Dodge Caravan that will beat your Civic. I like the Saleen a lot and would never pick a Honda over it. You may be confusing Saleen with a Saleen version Mustang, not the same thing. The Saleen S7 is a supercar bro not and econmy car.
 
the new ford lightning coming out with the active intercooling (550hp when the active cooling system is working, and mac semi truck like torque) system will smoke the dodge sstr or wahtever truck...and if it has a hard time doing so..just buy a 120$ pulley for the superchager..and get a 150$ tune....man..its so easy to tweak engines with FI.
 
Those exotics, and domestics of that callibur are pretty much out of reach for the general public because of price. Mustangs, yeah a bit outplayed and every one seems to have em. A Honda Civic pulling 10's great engineering, for the strip, not realworld friendly or street legal for that matter.

The kids of today are pretty much "bolt-on" upgraders or "sticker pushers" with "go fast wings." In the days I was coming up in the automotive scenes, we figured things out (needles, secondary timings, Vaccum advances, lift/duration) pretty much the things you do now, we just paved the way for you but ever try coordinating a 6 pack? Those only worked on the center carb with normal use. Mash the pedal, the outboard carbs opened up. Mulitple afb carters, side webers ... it's a far cry from todays computer controlled cars. Kids these days are slapping on too many stickers and only adding up hp #'s from intakes, exhaust and chips instead of taking it to the dyno. I can keep up with you tuner boys when it comes to bench top racing, but in the real world ... the speed comes down to the highway, not 1/4 mile times. You should see the faces of the kids when i take em at the line, wheels screaming and smoking, in my Taurus wagon (V6, 24 v DOHC) and that's stock. On the highway, with our 96 Impala SS or my 99 Limited ... kickdown the tranny and hold on while the car takes off. 100 mph comes up and is pased pretty quickly. Their speed /rev limiters come up even faster. Nitrous, yeah great for the track sux for the street. What are you gonna do after your tank runs out or if you're running too much juice for too long and burn your piston? My thing is, if the raw #'s are already there, going faster is not a problem. If you're spending to go as fast as me while I'm still stock, plan on something giving way because my money says that sooner or later something internal will give.

The kids that lust after the Fast & Furious movies are the ones that make me laugh. The people that make race purpose tuners have my respect. I use the terms kids and people as seperate entities. The "kids" are dangerous on the street. The "people" respect the street and take the danger to the track.

============================

Blueridge, yes I am deffinitely a 350 and above guy. Getting a solid 400 hp out of an LS1 is not the problem, squeezing the torque out is the challenge! You have to remember, the #'s being posted by the manufacturer are crank readings, not rear wheel. To be honest with you, i really wouldn't touch the LS1's to get the hp/torque #'s you are asking about. It's a rocket straight out of the box. If you want to strictly use it to race, that's a different story. If you're doing street light racing, why even bother? A lot of these rice rockets can't keep up with you on the highway, but will take you at the 60 foot marks but putter out just before the 1/4 mile comes by. And it's dangerous, I've had my close calls in the past. These rice burners are mostly noise anyway. Compare the raspiness of a 4 banger, the lackingness of a 6 (unless tuned like the 350Z - that has a nice note) to the idling grumble of a free breathing V8/roar of W.O.T. Is there really a comparison? not in my book, i'll take the roar of a V8.

The most I would do to the F body cars you're talking about (camaro/firebird aka pony cars) is get it breathing right with a cat back, high flow cat converter, headers, intake (unless it has the ramair option, reflash the computer with a hypertech unit (chips don't apply to gm cars above 1996, the chips are soldered to the board, not replaceable). Of course with all that go-power, you need to upgrade the binders on that beast to stop it. It's already powerful, work on the handeling. That's their weakness. You can go straight fast, but you gotta turn sooner or later.

I remember helping my dad on the first engine build I ever participated in. We built a boat engine from scratch. Just purchased the block (LT-1, 4 bolt main) and bought everything else from catalogs. When all was done, it was .40 over and all the High speed bells and whistles producing an approximate 425 hp ... on paper, never had it on a dyno. All I can say was that it was pushing our 4200 lb cuddy cabin above 58 mph on the Lowrance (pre gps, just triangulated via land based antane). On GPS it is actually 57.3 mph. Pretty good #'s for a boat that size ... 4 secs to plane and a very good topspeed, just bad mileage. Don't even ask how much, boats go Gallons/hour not Miles /gallon.

Fuel injection is great ... you can reflash the computer to work with your upgrades but Carbs require finesse and inginuity. That's why even with R/C's, a poor tune will be prominent. It's the patient person with a good ear as well as experience that get's his engine runing well. Tune it to the book's directions, then listen for the smoothness of the loping at idle and scream at WOT.
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by HumboldtBlazer
Well I can show you an 88 Dodge Caravan that will beat your Civic. I like the Saleen a lot and would never pick a Honda over it. You may be confusing Saleen with a Saleen version Mustang, not the same thing. The Saleen S7 is a supercar bro not and econmy car.
I thought we were just comparing ET's, lol. Hell yes I'd choose a Saleen over a civic! You must admit 10.9 1/4s in a NA civic are nice.

Diver, Please dont confuse me with a ricer. I;m not sure if your just tlaking about ricers or calling me one, lol. No, I've had my share of bolt ons and programming fuel curves with DSM Link. I know about lift and duration. Those who usually dont usually dont have fast cars. They think a wing, wheels, fart cannona nd K and N filter make there cars MAD TYTE YO!, god I hate ricers.
 
Back
Top