Yeah, but then again, people rate stuff differently. But as a failsafe, I only labeled it as the reedy, due to it having the same amperage capability (like all the other esc’s)
Hah lmao... yeah I agree. Wish he noticed as well but whatever. Doesn’t bother me much. I have no idea how someone could get mad at that but hey people do what they want.
It’s like the third or fourth reply. They were on their A game.
Funny you say that, but I have this one person who keeps getting angry (for whatever reason) every time I post something in a section that’s not “other rc’s”, like for example, when I made my differential showcase comparison with arrma versus revo 2.0, and it triggered some people that I put it...
Fixed thunder tiger esc specifications. Old ones were not accurate as they were found off of a combination of websites that happened to be incorrect.
Description was updated along with adding a hobao esc. Anyone know what hobao’s 100a esc is?
Well, if you want to be like that, buy a max6, put it in, and see for yourself. It will mount in at the same place, run at the same temp, and have the same performance. The only different things will be the programming and function feel (throttle feel and bec)
Well I apologize for not making you happy. It not only had a 160 amp rating identical to the max6, but also the same 8s capability, same dimensions all around, and same look. Definitely just had a high voltage BEC and a different software (hence the program limitation).
The BEC voltage has been in the air for awhile. If you can confirm that it actually is 8.4v than please do. On tons of forums I was getting mixed answers. Some saying it was a typo and some saying they weren’t sure.
Added leopard BL5 esc.
Edit: Poll results are surprising so far. If you voted “yes” I would like to see a reason that you would like having such unfair forum regulations ?